The author makes a good job of the data she's got, and tends to steer the debate away from the 'cult of the head' theories.

Slingshot 308

Its origin, as a PhD thesis, is evident; in other words it is a thorough and somewhat dry read. The author's style is that of a post-mortem report - there is no 'sexing' up the evidence here. However, given the frequency of the phenomenon in Britain, from the Neolithic until the early medieval period, this detailed study will be of considerable help both to field archaeologists and to the osteologists attempting crime scene investigations.

Minerva, November 2016 – reviewed by David Miles

... if archaeology interests you and you fancy a little gruesome but fascinating reading, you may very well find this to your liking. I did. A lot. Recommended.

Ripperologist, June 2016 - Paul Begg

Of the many different burial practices, decapitation burials are one of the most intriguing. These unusual cases - with the skull placed elsewhere in the grave, removed from the grave entirely, or where cut-marks clearly indicate its separation from the body - are widely believed to be some form of burial ritual after death.

Not so, Tucker argues. Drawing on her doctoral research, she re-examines the evidence and, focusing on skeletal trauma, comes to a different conclusion - that the majority of these decapitations were performed prior to death.

The subject of decapitation is approached chronologically from prehistory to the medieval period, with a particular focus on the decapitation elsewhere within the Roman Empire, and also its presence in ancient European art and literature, broadens the scope.

The technical language used will most benefit those familiar with skeletal anatomy, but the inclusion of colour photographs of a number of examples, as well as some unusual reconstruction drawings, certainly aids understanding.

Current Archaeology, August 2016 – Emma Watts – Plumpkin